Canaday v. Miller
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Miami district court; Jabez O. Rankin, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one for specific performance, the purpose being to require the defendant to accept title to certain lands in Arkansas. The defendant prevailed, and the plaintiff appeals.
The defendant traded a stock of goods to the plaintiff for land in Kansas and 'in Arkansas. Possession of the stock of goods was delivered to the plaintiff on certain conditions. The plaintiff furnished abstracts of title to the Arkansas land, which .were confessedly defective and which disclosed ques*578tionable title. Afterwards a second contract was made, giving…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Mays v. BlairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Read v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Leroy v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Shelton v. RatterreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peatling v. BairdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- White v. ImmenschuhSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Gould v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Hill v. PerroneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923