Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 1, 1985No. C9-85-128PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Roger Johnson seeks review of the trial court’s order sustaining revocation of his driving privileges under Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984). He asserts that the trial court erred in determining that the test was reliable. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was arrested for driving while intoxicated on September 27,1984. A certified Intoxilyzer operator administered the Intoxilyzer test, following standard procedures. The internal check of the machine indicated that it was functioning properly. Four air blank readings were taken, each of which registered at .000, the proper…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kadrlik v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Kramer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Ahrens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Schwarzrock v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Schultz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.