Legal Opinion

Illinois McGraw Electric Co. v. John J. Walters, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1959PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the courts below that defendant’s claim that plaintiff has assumed and breached general distributorship obligations to the defendant raises no triable issue, and that that part of the first defense and counterclaim set forth in defendant’s answer was properly struck with leave to defendant to replead claims arising out of alleged “ service and repairing” obligations (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113, subd. 5). Moreover, the Special Term correctly dismissed the first defense and counterclaim as being defectively pleaded since no facts are set forth specifying the extent and nature of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spruce Hill Homes, Inc. v. BrieantNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Dietz v. GlynneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Treacy v. Melrose Paper Stock Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Created Gemstones, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. J. R. Stevenson Corp. v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Crystalline H2O, Inc. v. OrminskiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
  4. Tyree Bros. Environmental Services Inc. v. Ferguson Propeller, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Scolite International Corp. v. Vincent J. Smith, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API