Spruce Hill Homes, Inc. v. Brieant
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff brought suit to foreclose a purchase money mortgage and, after answer and reply, moved for judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act. We are concerned with the third affirmative defense and counterclaim which sets up a breach, by the predecessors in title of defendants, including plaintiff’s assignor, of covenants of quiet enjoyment and freedom from encumbrances by reason of the fact that there existed across the land at the time of conveyance a private right of way by necessity in favor of an adjoining owner. One Couch at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hymes v. . EsteyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Callanan v. . KeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Pennock Et Ux. v. Goodrich Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Illinois McGraw Electric Co. v. John J. Walters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Schottland v. Brown Harris Stevens Brooklyn, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Rajchandra Corp. v. Tom Sawyer Motor Inns, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Neary v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Bibber v. WeberNew York Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.