Legal Opinion
Spitalnik v. City of New York
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 6, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment for the cash equivalent of accumulated vacation and overtime. Defendant’s affidavit in opposition requests summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
*184Plaintiff was an examining attorney employed by the New York City Department of Investigation in an exempt position. On February 1, 1966 his employment was terminated by summary dismissal by order of the commissioner. Plaintiff now seeks to recover the cash equivalent of the vacation and overtime accumulated during his 20 years of employment.
The commissioner was within his rights in discharging the plaintiff.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stetler v. . McFarlaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Doering v. HinrichsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Crane v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Matter of Croker v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Vaccaro v. Board of EducationCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clift v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Rubinstein v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Grossman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Rosenthal v. WalshCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Coates v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.