Legal Opinion

Grossman v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

A pithy statement of the nature of this case is presented in the decision of the count below: ‘ ‘ Plaintiff was a civil service employee, who was engaged as a computer programmer by defendants and was in their employ and service from October, 1963 to and including October 28, 1966 when he resigned to accept private employment. During the period of his employment, plaintiff worked 95 and 5/7 days of overtime for which he was never compensated and he now seeks recovery therefor.” (64 Mise 2d 962).

The key issue is whether plaintiff is required to delineate any statute, order or regulation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. City of New York v. Wilson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Stetler v. . McFarlaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Crane v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Matter of Croker v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clift v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Rubinstein v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Gendalia v. GioffreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Margolis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Coates v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API