Lyon v. Clark
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Willard C. Lyon, trustee of the estate of Ered E. Hazle and Frank B. Clark, bankrupts, against Nathaniel J. Clark, to recover the value of goods alleged to have been fraudulently conveyed. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Fred E. Hazle and Frank B. Clark, and brings this action in assumpsit to recover the value of a stock of goods alleged to have been transferred by the bankrupts to defendant within four months prior to the institution of the proceedings in bankruptcy. The circuit judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the value of the goods. The defendant brings error. Two important questions are presented: First, whether the case was a proper one to withdraw from the jury; and, second, whether assumpsit would lie for the goods, under the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watson v. SteverMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Hough v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Bedford v. PennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hackney v. Raymond Bros. Clarke Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Stearns Salt & Lumber Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Lyon v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- L. Starks Co. v. EppinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.