Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Penny

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1885PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to St. Olair. (Stevens, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

July 8, 1881, E. E. Starkweather & Co., who were engaged in the hardware trade at Port Huron, Michigan, sold their stock to the plaintiff. Pratt & Co., creditors of Starkweather & Co., attached the goods in question in this suit as the property of Stark-weather & Co., *425claiming the sale to plaintiff to be fraudulent, as being made with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud their creditors in the collection of their debts. The plaintiff brought replevin for the property against the defendant who held it as deputy sheriff of St. Clair county under the attachment aforesaid. Plaintiff, previous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willey v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Huckell v. McCoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Kerns v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Louden v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API