Legal Opinion
Steigman v. Berry
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided September 18, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Marvel, Vice Chancellor:
This action was commenced on January 3, 1963 on behalf of the defendant Tenney Corporation by Max Steigman, a Class A stockholder of the corporation purporting to act for all other stockholders of the corporation similarly situated and in the right of their corporation. His complaint alleged that such Class A stockholders had been injured at the hands of the defendant Jerry M. Tenney and the other defendants under his control through the alleged misuse of Mr. Tenney’s more than 90% ownership of Class B stock which by charter provision elects two-thirds of the board of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cohen v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steigman v. BeeryCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964