Legal Opinion

In Re Dubravsky

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 20, 2007No. 14-11929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

J. MICHAEL DEASY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court has before it the Objection to Claimed Exemption (Doc. No. 16) (the “Objection”) filed by Lawrence Sumski, chapter 13 trustee (the “Trustee”). The Trustee is objecting to Cynthia Dubrav-sky’s (the “Debtor”) claim of a homestead exemption pursuant to NH RSA 480:1 in the amount of $100,000.00. After notice, the Court held a hearing on the Objection on August 17, 2007. At the hearing, the Debtor and the Trustee submitted the matter to the Court on an agreed statement of facts and agreed documentary evidence. The Court took the Objection under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re EckolsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Schalebaum v. Town of Wolfeboro (In Re Schalebaum)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  3. In Re WezaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ViscontiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  2. In re FelicianoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  3. Gary Maurice St. LaurentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API