Cooper v. Kizer
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
In this case we are asked to determine the appropriate standard of review of an administrative decision denying an application for Medi-Cal benefits for the disabled. Appellant challenges the adequacy of the administrative finding that he was not disabled. He also contends that he should have been found disabled within the applicable statutory guidelines. Respondent contends that the trial court properly exercised independent judgment in reviewing the administrative record pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 and hence that the findings of the administrative…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Eleuterio MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Barber v. Long Beach Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Giuffre v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Oldham v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ruth v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.