Legal Opinion
Ruth v. Kizer
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1992No. A053670PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
Appellant Kenneth Kizer, Director of the California Department of Health Services (DHS), appeals a writ of mandate issued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 requiring him to authorize oxygen and portable oxygen equipment for Medi-Cal recipients Barbara Ruth, June P. Hall, Cricket J. Buffalo and Susan Molloy (collectively, respondents). At issue is whether appellant’s refusal to pay for oxygen and portable oxygen equipment for treatment of “Multiple Chemical Sensitivities” (MCS) violated federal and state law.
Facts and Procedural History
All respondents are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norasingh v. LightbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Blue v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kain v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Nathan G. v. Clovis Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.