CopyTele, Inc. v. E Ink Holdings, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING
(Docket No. 38)
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc. has filed a patent infringement action against Defendants E Ink Holdings, Inc. and. E Ink Corporation (collectively, “E. Ink”). According to CopyTele, it is the sole owner of all rights, title, and interest in three patents (the ’935 patent; the ’810 patent, and the ’488 patent), see Compl. ¶¶ 8-10, and E Ink has infringed on those patents. Currently pending before the Court is E Ink’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. In essence, E Ink…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Wolfe v. StrankmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Poorsina v. Bank of America, N. A.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Wisconsin Archery Products, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026