Legal Opinion

Poorsina v. Bank of America, N. A.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 14, 2024No. 3:23-cv-06644Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 23-cv-06644-PHK 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF 10 v. POORSINA’S AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 11 BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., et al., PURSUANT TO THE MANDATORY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS OF 28 12 Defendants. U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 13 Re: Dkt. No. 1 14 Now before the Court is the mandatory screening of pro se Plaintiff Ali Poorsina’s 15 (“Poorsina”) Complaint, dkt. 1, pursuant to the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The 16 Court previously granted Plaintiff…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API