Legal Opinion
Frumento v. Mezzanotte
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 10, 1984No. 10827PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiff, Frank Frumento, brought this action seeking specific performance of a contract entered into with the defendants, Mary Mez-zanotte and Louis D’Onofrio, Jr., administrator d.b.n. of the estate of Louis D’Onofrio, co-owners of certain real property located in West Haven. The trial court refused to decree specific performance and this appeal followed.
The pertinent facts found by the trial court are as follows: The realty in question was purchased in 1948 by David Mezzanotte, the now-deceased husband of the defendant Mary Mezzanotte, and Louis D’Onofrio, the now-deceased father of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- DiBella v. WidlitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- O'Sullivan v. BergentySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Smith v. Hevro Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Natural Harmony, Inc. v. NormandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.