Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 13, 2004No. Docket Nos. 02-6102(L), 02-6112(L), 02-6122, 02-6124, 02-6126, 02-7405(CON)Published

1DissentJacobs, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Participants in New York City’s Work Experience Program (“WEP”) are not covered by Title VII because they are not “employees” of the City of New York. Under the settled principles set out in this opinion: (1) a person is not an employee unless she is “hired” by an employer (and is not an independent contractor); (2) a person is hired only if she receives direct or indirect remuneration for services rendered; (3) the remuneration must be substantial; and (4) remuneration includes wages and benefits but excludes benefits that are incidental to the work.

The welfare…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API