Commonwealth v. Holland
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*291HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends, inter alia, that the lower court erred in refusing to propound his requested voir dire questions on racial prejudice. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgments of sentence and grant appellant a new trial.1
Before jury selection, appellant, a black man, requested the lower court to propound 39 questions to the prospective jurors, including four questions probing the veniremen’s possible racial bias.2 Although the lower court permitted a number of appellant’s proposed questions, it refused those concerning race. An all-white jury was chosen, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SisakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. BossickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Com. v. Harvey, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.