Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schroeder & Tremayne v. Haid

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 5, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.

This case comes to the writer on reassignment. It is a certiorari proceeding in which relator seeks to quash an opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in the case of Cushulas v. Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc. In that case plaintiff recovered a default judgment for alleged personal injuries, which was affirmed by the St. Louis Court of Appeals. The only question urged in the Court of Appeals and here, is whether or not plaintiff’s petition stated a cause of action. That part of the petition here in question reads as follows:

“Plaintiff for his cause of action states that on the - day of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowie v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Schneider v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Mack v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Frazer v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Shaler v. Van WormerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zichler v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Niemczyk v. BurlesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Taylor v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Barber v. Allright Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API