Town of Hinesburg v. Dunkling
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
Defendant/landowner Paul Dunkling appeals the Chittenden Superior Court’s grant of plaintiff/cross-appellant Town of Hinesburg’s summary judgment motion and grant of Town’s request for a mandatory injunction and fine for noncompliance with a town zoning bylaw. Landowner contends that: (1) Town’s notice that the zoning board of adjustment (ZBA) had rendered a decision was insufficient to raise the bar of 24 V.S.A. § 4472 in Town’s subsequent enforcement action, (2) because the assessed fine was punitive in nature, landowner was entitled to the same due process and constitutional safeguards as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Wesco, Inc. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.