Legal Opinion
Shah v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 2, 2014No. 13-1905PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Chief Judge.
This case is a good example for why arguments should be made to the Immigration Judge (“U”) and the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) in the first instance, and why the arguments actually made should be clear. Ali Shah, a citizen and native of Pakistan, petitions for review of a June 20, 2013 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. He argues that the BIA did not properly address either of his arguments going to earlier adverse credibility findings. He makes to us a series of arguments in support of reopening that were never presented to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Raza v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Fesseha v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Smith v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- D-I-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Soule Ex Rel. Stanescu v. Connecticut Association of Schools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Paiz-Morales v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Sanchez-Vasquez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Avelar Gonzalez v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Granados Benitez v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.