Legal Opinion

D-I-M

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2008No. ID 3599PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

24 I&N Dec. 448

(BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3599 Matter of D-I-M-, Respondent Decided February 12, 2008 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) When evaluating an application for asylum, the Immigration Judge must make a specific finding that the applicant has or has not suffered past persecution based on a statutorily enumerated ground and then apply the regulatory framework at

8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1) (2007). (2) If the applicant has established past persecution, there is a presumption of a well-founded fear of persecution in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. S-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  2. Niang v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Emil Avgoustov Krastev Neli Pecheva Krasteva v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Hang Kannha Yuk v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. S-HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lecaj v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. A-S-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
  3. Brezilien v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Gatimi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Maria Juan Antonio v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API