Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. ONLINE RESOURCES CORP.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 12, 2011No. Case 2:08-cv-1188PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Online Resources Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 57.) Defendant requests this Court to dismiss the majority of claims alleged in the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Kent D. Stuckey, authorized Stockholders’ Representative of the former stockholders of Internet Transaction Solutions, Inc. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Kent D. Stuckey was named the representative of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stuckey v. Online Resources Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  2. Laber v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  3. Barrett-O'Neill v. LALO, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  4. BLACKBEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. v. YOUNGSTOWN PIPE & STEEL, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Crooksville Family Clinic v. Quest Diagnostics IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API