Stuckey v. ONLINE RESOURCES CORP.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Online Resources Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 57.) Defendant requests this Court to dismiss the majority of claims alleged in the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Kent D. Stuckey, authorized Stockholders’ Representative of the former stockholders of Internet Transaction Solutions, Inc. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Kent D. Stuckey was named the representative of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stuckey v. Online Resources Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Laber v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Barrett-O'Neill v. LALO, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- BLACKBEAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. v. YOUNGSTOWN PIPE & STEEL, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Crooksville Family Clinic v. Quest Diagnostics IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.