Legal Opinion

Johnson County Savings Bank v. Walker

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 14, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by the indorsee against the acceptor of four bills of exchange, brought to the District Court of Waterbury and tried to the jury before Peck, Acting-Judge; verdict and judgment for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

This cause, on two former trials (79 Conn. 348, 65 Atl. 132, and 80 Conn. 509, 69 Atl. 15), resulted in judgments for the defendant in the District Court of Waterbury.

The bills in question were drawn in favor of an Iowa manufacturing corporation, which had indorsed them to the plaintiff, an Iowa banking corporation. The defendant set up in her answer that the acceptances were procured by fraud, and that the plaintiff had notice of this when it acquired title, and that it paid no consideration for them. These averments were denied by the reply.

The reasons of appeal question the refusal of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson County Savings Bank v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Dutchess County Mutual Insurance v. HachfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Johnson County Savings Bank v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Merchants National Bank v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. Beardsley v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Maryland Finance Corp. v. Peoples Bank of KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API