Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. City of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 10, 1997No. 96-1210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

Appellant Danny Honeycutt appeals a summary judgment against him relating to the denial of a trial and grievance hearing before appellee Civil Service Commission of Fort Smith (Commission) in connection with his ten-day suspension without pay. We agree with the trial court that neither proceeding was required under the facts of this case, and we affirm.

The events leading up to the ten-day suspension are taken from Honeycutt’s testimony before the trial court and other documents introduced at the hearing. On July 30, 1995, Honeycutt, who was a captain with the Fort…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. DeHart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Godwin v. ChurchmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Magness v. McEntireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Loftus v. CarbondaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pre-Paid Solutions, Inc. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Hannon v. Armorel School District 9Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API