Legal Opinion

Godwin v. Churchman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 1991No. 91-107PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The appellants (“Godwin”) appeal from two orders dismissing their complaint against the appellees (“Churchman/Turner/Bonds”). The trial court’s dismissals were premised on violation of the statute of limitations and failure to state appropriate facts under Ark. R. Civ. P. 8(a) and 12(b)(6).

We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand.

In June 1981 Godwin, who had an established accounting practice, began discussions with Churchman/Turner/Bonds, who were also accountants, about working together under a mutually agreeable business arrangement. Over the next three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Battle v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Rabalaias v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Mid-South Beverages, Inc. v. Forrest City Grocery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Taylor v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Guthrie v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Servewell Plumbing, LLC v. Summit Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Clark v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Schueck v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. The Stonebridge Collection v. Keith CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Pyle v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API