State v. Coles
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CATTANI, Judge.
¶ 1 David Harold Coles appeals the superi- or court’s ruling rejecting his argument that Scottsdale’s public intoxication ordinance is preempted by a state statute that prohibits local ordinances penalizing or imposing sanctions for intoxication. For reasons that follow, we conclude that the state statute preempts the local ordinance, and we reverse the superior court’s ruling.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On December 21, 2011, the City of Scottsdale cited Coles under Scottsdale City Code (“S.C.C.”) section 19-8(a) for being “incapacitated by alcohol in public.” No…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Hasten v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Scottsdale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015