Legal Opinion

Warfield v. Raymond

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 12, 1950No. [H.C. No. 40, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. In his brief filed in this court the petitioner’s chief complaints are as to medical treatment, or lack of it, by Dr. Conrad and his staff, and the quality of the food. As we pointed out in the case of State, ex rel. Baldwin v. Superintendent of State Reformatory for Males, 192 Md. 712, 63 A. 2d 323, such complaints do not afford any basis for release on habeas corpus, but should be addressed to the Board of Correction. See also Edmondson v. Warden of Md. House of Correction, 194 Md. 707, 69 A. 2d 919.

In his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Edmondson v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Baldwin v. Superintendent of Maryland State Reformatory for MalesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Brabson v. WilkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Robinson v. DirectorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Schack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API