Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided November 30, 1987No. 85-1798PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OXBERGER, Chief Judge.

Both parties in this appeal challenge the economic portion of the trial court’s decree dissolving their marriage. Respondent Ronald Wheeler argues that the trial court incorrectly calculated the value of his vested unmatured pension program and thus urges that the portion of the plan awarded to the petitioner is incorrect. Petitioner Judith Wheeler has cross-appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in ordering the respondent to pay her portion of the pension over a period of eight years without requiring him to pay interest thereon. We affirm as modified.

Before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of BeversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. In Re the Marriage of BornsteinCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
  4. In Re the Marriage of PhippsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
  2. In Re the Marriage of KeiferCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API