Shelkowitz v. Rainess
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Dismissal of the complaint was proper where plaintiff did not effect service of the summons and complaint upon defendant within 120 days after the filing of the action (CFLR 306-b). Nor is an extension of time for service warranted in the “interest of justice” (id.). The request for an extension of time was not made until opposition to defendant’s cross motion to dismiss, which was approximately 20 months after the filing of the action (see Slate v Schiavone Constr. Co., 4 NY3d 816 [2005]; Pecker Iron Works, Inc. v Namasco Corp., 37 AD3d 367 [2007]). Furthermore, contrary to plaintiffs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Slate v. Schiavone Construction CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pecker Iron Works, Inc. v. Namasco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henneberry v. BorsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Krembs v. NYU Langone Hosps.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Krembs v. NYU Langone Hosps.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- State v. MappaNew York Supreme Court · 2009