Legal Opinion

Slate v. Schiavone Construction Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2005PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted and the certified question answered in the negative. In view of the extreme lack of diligence shown by plaintiff, and the long delay (more than a year and a half after running of the statute of limitations) before defendant received any notice of the action, the courts below abused their discretion in granting plaintiff an extension to serve defendant “in the interest of justice” pursuant to CPLR 306-b (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Riccio v. GhulamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Redman v. South Island Orthopaedic Group, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Sutter v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Christiana Trust v. LericheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API