Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul U.S. Asbestos Personal Injury Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2011No. 10-1290PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an insurance duty-to-defend case. Plaintiff-Appellant Federal-Mogul U.S. Asbestos Personal Injury Trust filed a complaint in the district court seeking declaratory relief. The Trust holds an umbrella insurance policy issued by Defendant-Appellee Continental Insurance Company and claims that pursuant to that policy, Continental is now required to defend the Trust against certain claims. Continental, contending it is under no duty to defend, moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The district court agreed and dismissed the complaint.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Keith Harbin-Bey v. Lyle RutterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Katz v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Realcomp II, Ltd. v. ACE American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Farm Bureau General Insurance Co. of Michigan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Glassman, Edwards, Wyatt, Tuttle & Cox, P.C. v. Wade (In re Wade)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.