Legal Opinion

Ryals v. United States (In Re Ryals)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 12, 2009No. Bankruptcy No. 3:bk-07-00399. Adversary No. 3:08-ap-0065-JAFPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING JACK C. RYALS’ CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JERRY A. FUNK, Bankruptcy Judge.

This proceeding came before the Court upon United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (the “Motion”), Ryals’ Response and Counter-Motion to [the Motion] (the “Response and Cross-Motion”) and United States’ Reply in Support of [the Motion] and Opposition to Ryals’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Jack C. Ryals (“Ryals”) commenced this adversary proceeding by filing a complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spence v. Hintze (In re Hintze)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2017
  2. Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. United States (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API