Legal Opinion

Friel v. McAdoo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by the petitioner, Joseph H. Friel, from an order of the Supreme ■ Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and-entered in the office of the dlerk of the county of Kings on the 5th day of October19047 denying the petitioner’s motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus. ' ■ .

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. :

The relator was appointed to the police force of the city of Brooklyn on or about the TOth'day of January, 1884, and became a 'member of the police force of the.city of Kew York by virtue of the provisions of chapter 378 of the Laws of 1897, and has since continued to be a member of such force. On or about the 15th day of March, 1904, he caused a demand to be made upon the police commissioner that lie be retired upon a pension, as provided by law, because appellant had served in the police department for upwards of twenty years. . This demand was denied, and the relator, has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wirtz v. NestosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lickert v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Day v. MrukNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Attorney General v. ConnollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In re the Estate of O'DonnellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API