In re Di Marti
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a final order of the City Court of Buffalo, rendered in. summary proceedings on April 11, 1911, removing the appellant from certain premises, on the ground his term had expired and he was holding over without the consent of his landlord.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The owner of the premises in dispute, on or about the 1st of January, 1909, was the petitioner, Maria Di Marti. On or about the 6th day of January, 1909, Joseph Di Marti, the husband of the .respondent, entered into a written lease with the appellant, by which he demised to the appellant the premises in question for the term of five years from January 1, 1909, to January 1, 1914. In this written lease, the husband, Joseph Di Marti, described himself as the landlord and signed the instrument in his own name. The lease did not disclose the fact that his wife, Maria, was the owner of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Hyatt v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Reed v. . GannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Anderson v. ConnerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
- United Realty & Mortgage Co. v. StoothoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gleason v. TompkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Gibbs Oil Co. v. ElowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
- McMillan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019