Anderson v. Conner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the landlords from a final order rendered in. favor of the tenant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan, in a dispossess proceeding taken for the nonpayment of rent.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
The history of the material facts in this case is as follows: La 1899 the demised premises were owned by George and Charles H. River. On August 13, 1899, they leased the premises, an apartment-house, to the Amsterdam Realty Company, a domestic corporation, for the term of ten" years. The Amsterdam Realty Company took possession of said premises and continued to occupy and collect the rents therefrom until October 23, 1901, when they surrendered their lease and the possession of the premises to the Plyers.
Prior to this time and in August, 1901, the defendant had entered into possession and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Hyatt v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Appelbaum v. GalewskiNew York Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holm v. C.M.P. Sheet Metal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- State v. Fin & Feather ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Lemkin v. GuldeNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Radcliffe Associates, Inc. v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- United Realty & Mortgage Co. v. StoothoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.