Legal Opinion

In Re Hartman

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 2005No. 5 JD 04PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge O’TOOLE.

I.INTRODUCTION

The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint with this Court on October 29, 2004 against District Justice Edward E. Hartman (Respondent) consisting of five counts which charge Respondent as follows:

1. Violation of Rule 15(B)(1) of the Rules. Governing Standards of Con- . duct of District Justices (Count 1),

2. Violation of Rule 15(B)(2) of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of District Justices (Count 2),

3. Violation of Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of District Justices (Count 3),

4. Violation of Rule 4(D) of the Rules…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. In Re CicchettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. In Re ToczydlowskiCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. In Re TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Matter of CodispotiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API