Legal Opinion

People v. Sanders

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1982PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

On this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the recorded statements of a third party inculpating the defendant in the crimes charged were properly admitted into evidence under the coconspirators’ exception to the hearsay rule. In resolving this issue, we must determine whether the use of these recorded statements violated defendant’s constitutional right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” (US Const, 6th Arndt; NY Const, art I, § 6.)

In the late summer months of 1976, Dr. Wallace B. Lehman, a Nassau County orthopedic specialist, contacted his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. BongarzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. AyalaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API