People v. Sanders
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
On this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the recorded statements of a third party inculpating the defendant in the crimes charged were properly admitted into evidence under the coconspirators’ exception to the hearsay rule. In resolving this issue, we must determine whether the use of these recorded statements violated defendant’s constitutional right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” (US Const, 6th Arndt; NY Const, art I, § 6.)
In the late summer months of 1976, Dr. Wallace B. Lehman, a Nassau County orthopedic specialist, contacted his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BongarzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. AyalaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.