Legal Opinion
United States v. Castillo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1996No. 94-10777PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-appellants (defendants) were convicted of one count of conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Defendant-appellant David Castillo was additionally found guilty of a second count of possession with intent to distribute approximately thirty-two pounds of marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(D) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Defendants now appeal their respective convictions and sentences. We affirm.
Facts and Proceedings Below
I. Charles Ballard’s Testimony
On March 13, 1993, Charles Ballard…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Puig-InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Norberto AlanizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. FullwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.