Legal Opinion

Hansing v. Hansing

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1919No. 10082PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles. Judge. Action for divorce and, alimony by Anna Hansing against Harry C. Hansing. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendant brings error. '

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the district court of Noble county, granting defendant in error a divorce and $1,650 permanent alimony, and pending appeal, $25 per month, temporary alimony. On July 30, 1918, this aourt made an order directing plaintiff in error to pay $50 per month temporary alimony pending appeal, beginning August 1, 1918, payable on the first of each month; $150 attorney’s fees, $40 suit money and $125 temporary alimony due under order of the district court; payment of suit money', one-half of attorney’s fee and one-half accumulated alimony to be paid on or before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Hartshorn v. HartshornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Kostachek v. KostachekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blair v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Hood v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Ent v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API