Hood v. Hancock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; H. -L. 'Standeven, Judge. Action by C, H. Hancock against C. -O. Hood. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This action was instituted by defendant in error, plaintiff below, to recover the possession of certain office rooms in the city of Tulsa. From a judgment for defendant in error, plaintiff in error prosecutes this appeal.
On May 25, 1920, upon the motion of the defendant in error, this court made and entered an order requiring plaintiff in error to execute an additional supersedeas bond in the sum of $1,000, the same to be approved by the court clerk of Tulsa county, and to be filed in this court within 30 days from the date of said order. Plaintiff in error having failed to comply with such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hansing v. HansingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ent v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921