Legal Opinion
In re Kimbrough-Veasey Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided October 20, 1923No. 1487PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, District Judge.
Palmer-Murphy Company, claiming an indebtedness of $1,705 against Kimhrough-Veasey Company, now bankrupt, brought suit and garnished others. To dissolve the garnishment a bond to pay the eventual condemnation money was given by *758Kimbrough-Veasey Company with Stoval and Shouse as sureties, $1,500 in money being placed with the sureties to indemnify them against loss. More than four months afterward Kimbrough-Veasey Company informed these sureties that it looked as though the former rwould be “closed up,” and directed them to settle the suit as cheaply as possible and turn…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kendrick v. J. B. O'Neil, Foster & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Lumpkin v. CallowaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Roy v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Gilstrap v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. OuztsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Coleman v. BeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Merrill v. Prebilt Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Strelitz v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936