Legal Opinion

Strelitz v. First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 7, 1936:

Fairchild, J.

The appeal comes on the ruling of the trial court that Gertrude Strelitz was entitled to be subro-gated to the former rights of the appellant in the note and mortgage. The pleadings and the stipulation together with the testimony taken at the trial give us undisputed facts, and leaves for determination only the question of the right of respondent to subrogation. The controlling fact is that the respondent was indebted to the appellant on her note of $15,000. Under the Negotiable Instruments Law, regardless of the inducement which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGrath v. . Carnegie Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Knaffl v. Knoxville Banking & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Musgrave v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Barton v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Bank of Baraboo v. ProtheroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fleetwood v. Med Center BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API