Legal Opinion

Monarch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1999No. A081178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SWAGER,

J. — In a bifurcated proceeding, the jury found that appellant’s action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (hereafter the FELA) (45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq.) to recover damages for his loss of hearing was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. The court subsequently entered judgment in favor of respondent, 1 and this appeal ensued.

Appellant complains that the trial court erred by bifurcating the statute of limitations issue, altering the order of proof, excluding evidence of equitable estoppel, instructing the jury, and dismissing his fraud cause of action. We find…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Reidelbach v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hood v. Santa Barbara Bank & TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Hood v. Santa Barbara Bank & TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Torres v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API