Legal Opinion
Iverson v. Zoning Board
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 26, 1974No. 11, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
Howard County, situate between the city of Baltimore and Washington, District of Columbia, has, as a result of population shifts and migrations from those two cities, experienced a growth in its own population. Howard County’s growth, and its potential growth, would appear to increase rezoning applications in order to augment permissible density in a given area. This is such a case.
The appellant, George Dudley Iverson, V, filed a petition to “rezone approximately 439 acres of land from an R-90 Zoning District [residential zoning, but building lots must be at least 90,000 square feet] to an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Jobar Corp. v. Rodgers Forge Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Wells v. PierpontCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Montgomery County v. National Capital Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Montgomery County Council v. ScrimgeourCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Boyds Civic Ass'n v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Copple v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Coppolino v. County Board of AppealsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Stump v. GRAND LODGE OF ANCIENTCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.