People v. McDermott
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.
These are two separate applications to remove the above-entitled criminal actions from the County Court, Rockland County, to a term of the Supreme Court in the same county.
Prom a practical viewpoint it is difficult to understand why the motions are so strenuously opposed. The affidavits upon these motions do not establish any improper conduct upon the part of the County Judge in his relations with the prosecution upon which these indictments were found by the grand jury. By removal there would be no inconvenience. Instead of a county judge there would be a choice of several justices of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . DohringNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- People v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- People ex rel. Singer v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- People ex rel. Liberty v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Matter of Robert Jackson Horton, Bankrupt. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. v. Robert Jackson Horton, M. Nolten, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoenas Duces Tecum "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E", and Subpoenas of Helen Sills and Nancy Doyle. Appeal of Henry J. Cianfrani, Intervenor in 77-1970, 77-2051/2/3. Appeal of Thomas J. Kalman, in No. 77-1971Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Gold v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Application of Citizens Utilities CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. Bevilacqua, New York County Courts1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.