Legal Opinion

H. R. & C. Co. v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Jaycox, J.:

The controversy involved in this action arises in this way: Mrs. Hedges, under the name of Mary Elizabeth Hedges, made a mortgage to Francis B. Riggs, dated August 21, 1913. Default was made in a payment on this mortgage and a foreclosure action was instituted. A search was made for the purpose of that foreclosure to July 5, 1916. On the 6th day of July, 1916, a judgment against Bess Hedges, Dayton Hedges and the Municipal Asphalt Company, in favor of George D. Smith, for the sum of $5,060.58, was docketed in Kings county, where the premises involved in this action are situated.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Franklin v. TalmadgeNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. In re SnookNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859
  4. Davis v. SteepsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cornes v. . WilkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API