In Re the Discipline of Kimmel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHEREAS, by decision of this court filed July 23, 1982, In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn.1982), respondent’s practice has been restricted to examiner of titles throughout the remainder of his probation in connection with State of Minnesota v. Harold Dean Kimmel, Washington County, - # 4479, Pine County # 64-25B; and
WHEREAS, by order of the Washington County District Court dated April 2, 1984, respondent was discharged from probation; and
WHEREAS, respondent has satisfied all current Continuing Legal Education requirements and has paid all past and current attorney registration fees;
IT…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In Re KeithleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- In re Reinstatement of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988