Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Kimmel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1984No. C1-81-955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WHEREAS, by decision of this court filed July 23, 1982, In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn.1982), respondent’s practice has been restricted to examiner of titles throughout the remainder of his probation in connection with State of Minnesota v. Harold Dean Kimmel, Washington County, - # 4479, Pine County # 64-25B; and

WHEREAS, by order of the Washington County District Court dated April 2, 1984, respondent was discharged from probation; and

WHEREAS, respondent has satisfied all current Continuing Legal Education requirements and has paid all past and current attorney registration fees;

IT…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re KeithleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. In re Reinstatement of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API