Allen v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Dietzman
—Reversing.
The appellants were indicted for the offense of robbery and sentenced to serve two years in the penitentiary. To reverse the judgment against them, they first insist that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence. To dispose of this contention requires a resume of the evidence.
For the commonwealth, Coet Conley testified that one Friday morning (the date not being given in the narrative bill of exceptions, although it is clear that it was before the finding of the indictment) about 10 o’clock he and Callie Napier, Frankie Napier, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Branham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Kirk v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Wells v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Southerland, Lawson Vaughn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Haynes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Catron v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933