Legal Opinion

Wells v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 29, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Estill Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

Upon their trial in the Estill circuit court on an indictment charging them with the illicit manufacture of whiskey by operating a “moonshine” still, the appellants, Sol Wells and Charlie Isaacs, were convicted and each of them punished by a fine and imprisonment in the county jail. Their motion for a new trial was overruled and each of them has appealed.

They relied in their motion upon numerous errors as entitling them to a new trial, among which are: (1), because the verdict was contrary to the evidence and not supported by it, and (2), error of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Day v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Kirk v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Cloninger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Wellington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Saylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Branham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Day v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Hogan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Fannin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Haupe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API