Graebel Moving & Storage v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
LaROCQUE J.
The Labor and Industry Review Commission appeals a judgment reversing its finding that Michael Rosera was entitled to unemployment compensation benefits as a Graebel Moving & Storage of Wisconsin employee within the meaning of sec. 108.02(12)(a), Stats. We conclude that credible evidence supports the commission's finding that Rosera was not customarily engaged in an independently established trade, business or profession, and we therefore reverse the judgment and remand for reinstatement of its decision.
Rosera originally worked for Graebel as an intrastate truck driver and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Transport Oil, Inc. v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Vande Zande v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Sears v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Roberts v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Goldberg v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- City of Oak Creek Ex Rel. Water & Sewer Utility Commission v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- City of Oak Creek Ex Rel. Water & Sewer Utility Commission v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006